ECONOMIC SYSTEMS AND HOW THEY SHAPE PROCUREMENT LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS .

ECONOMIC SYSTEMS AND HOW THEY SHAPE PROCUREMENT LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS .

 

1.INTRODUCTION.

Governments have traditionally held the responsibility for a broad range of functions  including ensuring national defense, building and maintaining the national infrastructure, assessing and collecting taxes and revenues, promoting public health and well being, and providing education

The execution of these responsibilities requires the acquisition of goods, works, and services, thereby making public procurement a significant channel through which public funds are expended. Government agencies must therefore ensure that procurement processes are conducted in a fair, transparent, and accountable manner.   In addition,they are increasingly required to adopt modern tools  including electronic procurement systems to enhance efficiency.[1]

To this end, Ghana took a significant step through a reform initiative on 25 October 2025 transitioning from manual to fully digital financial management systems.

Announced by  the Deputy Finance Minister; Mr. Thomas Nyarko Ampem, , this reform mandates that effective January 2026,  all public expenditure be processed exclusively through the Ghana Integrated Financial Management Information System (GIFMIS). This reform was introduced to enhance efficiency, strengthen expenditure control and combat corruption within the financial management framework.[2]

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defines Public Procurement as the purchase by governments and state-owned enterprises of goods, services and works. It accounts for a significant amount of total general government expenditure.[3] However, procurement is not merely an administrative purchasing activity; it is a legal and economic mechanism through which the State allocates resources within the economy.[4]

Policies and processes regarding procurement are often reflective of the economic system practiced. The crux of this article is to primarily focus on the three traditional economic systems, for the purpose of examining their structures, their advantages and disadvantages. It will also provide a concise overview of the public procurement law in Ghana and undertake a comparative analysis of how the three most prominent economic systems have shaped procurement policies, regulatory frameworks and laws in specific countries.

 

2. THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT.

In Ghana, Public procurement is governed by the Public Procurement Act, 2003 (Act 663). The Act established the Public Procurement Authority as the regulatory body responsible for the effective implementation of public procurement law in Ghana. [5]The Authority regulates, monitors and supervises public procurement processes to ensure transparency, accountability, efficiency and value for money in use of public funds.

For instance, when a road needs to be constructed the  procurement agency would identify a need for a procurement plan, advertise the contract and invite bids from qualified  contractors. The bids are then evaluated and the one which provides the most value for money is awarded with the contract.[6] All these activities are supervised and overseen by the Authority.

In OECD countries, public procurement accounts for approximately 13% of gross domestic product (GDP), while globally it ranges from an average of 13% to 20% of GDP.[7] In monetary terms, public procurement spending is estimated to amount to nearly USD 9.5 trillion worldwide.[8]

Given the significant impact of these figures on global GDP, procurement cannot be viewed in isolation from the systems that govern it. The next phase of this analysis explores the dominant economic models and the specific ways they inform and refine procurement frameworks across different jurisdictions.

3. CONCEPT AND CLASSIFICATION OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS

According to the Corporate Finance Institute (CFI), Economic systems are the means by which societies or governments organize and distribute available resources, services, and goods across a geographic region or country[9]. Economic systems regulate the factors of production, including land, capital, labour and physical resources.[10] They also shape how resources are allocated, how prices are determined, and the extent to which government intervene in economic activity. The economic system adopted by a country significantly influences and determines the structure.

Among the most prominent systems are the market economy, the planned economy, and the mixed economy, each reflecting different balances between private enterprise and state control. Understanding the distinctions between these systems is essential, as they significantly influence public procurement processes, and overall economic development.

4. THE MARKET ECONOMY

A market economy is characterized by minimal state intervention, with economic decisions driven primarily by supply and demand. Resource allocation, pricing and production are determined through market interactions rather than centralized planning. It is also known as a free market economy or a capitalist economy[11] and is most notably practiced in Singapore and Hong Kong.

Beyond definition, what truly distinguishes market economies is the belief that when economic decisions are made independently by buyers and sellers rather than by the government, the allocation of resources tends to be more efficient. For example, in Ghana, the transition from cash transactions to digital and mobile money payment systems, reflects how network providers and banks have responded to its consumer demands following the introduction of Mobile Money by MTN in 2009. Although the initiative was introduced within a regulated framework with significant restrictions, its rapid expansion was driven largely by market demand rather than government compulsion.[12] The success of this initiative encouraged other telecommunications companies such as Vodafone and Airtel-Tigo to introduce similar mobile money services in order to remain competitive within the market.

This dynamic highlights the core strength of the market system: its ability to foster innovation through competition rather than central planning. However, the efficiency of such a decentralized model is often balanced against its inherent volatility. To understand how these market forces are managed in practice, it is necessary to examine the specific attributes, strengths, and systemic limitations that define the free market framework.

In a market economy, private ownership and competition sit at the centre of economic activity. Individuals and firms control resources and make independent decisions about production and consumption, rather than waiting for instructions from some distant bureaucratic office. In Ghana, this is visible in the formal sector, where banks, manufacturers, and service providers operate within legal frameworks but ultimately respond to consumer demand. The constant pressure to outperform rivals forces businesses to improve quality, reduce costs, and offer prices that consumers can actually tolerate.

Closely tied to this is the way prices are determined. Instead of being fixed by the state, prices emerge from the interaction between supply and demand. These price signals quietly coordinate the entire economy, telling producers what to make and consumers what they can afford. When scarcity hits, as seen during the COVID-19 period in Ghana, prices adjust quickly, sometimes uncomfortably so, reflecting the underlying imbalance between what is available and what is wanted.

The role of government in such a system is deliberately limited. Ideally, it focuses on maintaining law and order, enforcing property rights, and providing essential public goods, while leaving the market to handle the rest. The theory sounds clean and elegant. Reality, as usual, is messier, but the general idea remains that less interference allows the system to function more freely.

Advantages And Disadvantages of Market Economies

Market economies promote efficiency, innovation and consumer choice. Competition tends to improve consumer welfare by expanding choice and keeping prices relatively competitive.

However these systems are not without limitations. Market failures may occur particularly in the presence of monopolies. Inequality is also a persistent concern , as wealth and resources tend to concentrate among a limited segment of the population and which potentially undermines competition. Over time, wealth and productive resources can become concentrated in the hands of a few, reducing competition and making the “free” market feel suspiciously controlled, just by private actors instead of the state.

5. PLANNED ECONOMIES

In contrast a planned economy is an economic system characterized by centralized control where the state determines pricing, production and distribution. Examples of planned economies are communist and socialist systems where facets of economic productions are controlled by government.

Essentially, under planned economies, producers and sellers sell their products at prices predefined by the government. The overall objectives of such countries are to focus on the overall growth and development of the economy at large rather than focusing on benefitting private individuals. The former Soviet Union was a classic example of a planned economy, where the State owned all the means of production and all economic decisions between the years of 1922 to 1992.[13] However, it faced several challenges which led to its collapse. These challenges are addressed further in this article.  There are several characteristics of planned economies, below are some basic characteristic and key attributes of a planned economy.

• Under planned economies, the government owns most of the resources and businesses and controls directly the economic activity of the country.
• The prices of goods and services are set by the government by assessing the value and the importance of the products and services provided to it by the producers or the sellers
• The distribution, pricing and decisions relating to the goods and services to be provided are based on predefined goals and targets established by the government or government agencies
• The government is extensively involved in every aspect of the economic life which includes the production levels, resource allocation, distribution.

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Planned Economies.

A planned economy offers several advantages, particularly in terms of regulation and social welfare. One major advantage is that producers cannot engage in malpractices because the government determines production levels and closely supervises economic activities. Since the State controls what is produced and how it is distributed, opportunities for exploitation, artificial scarcity, and unfair business practices are significantly reduced.[14]

Another advantage is that consumers and buyers are protected from exorbitant prices. In a planned economy, prices are set by the government rather than by market forces. This helps to ensure affordability and prevents price manipulation that may arise from monopolies or excessive profit-seeking behaviour. As a result, essential goods and services are often made accessible to the general population.[15]

Additionally, resources are often distributed more equitably across different sections of the economy. The government allocates resources according to national priorities and social needs rather than individual wealth or purchasing power. This promotes social equality and aims to reduce disparities in income and access to essential services.

Despite these advantages, a planned economy also has notable disadvantages. One major drawback is that producers are unable to maximize profit due to the complete control of the government over production, pricing, and distribution of goods and services. The absence of profit incentives may reduce motivation, innovation, and entrepreneurial initiative.

Furthermore, due to the lack of competition among producers, efficiency and product quality may be adversely affected. Competition often drives businesses to improve services and innovate; however, in a planned economy, the absence of competitive pressure may lead to complacency, inefficiency, and lower standards of goods and services.

Another disadvantage is that consumers do not enjoy freedom of choice and variety. Since the government determines what is produced, consumers are often limited to certain products and services. In essence, their preferences may not be fully considered, resulting in limited options in the marketplace.[16]

6.MIXED ECONOMIES

A mixed economic system integrates elements of both market economy or capitalism and planned economy or socialism, balancing private property rights and economic freedom with government oversight to further social objectives. It benefits from the advantages of these economies whiles also experiencing some disadvantages.

Ghana is notably considered as a having a mixed economy. Ghana’s economy is largely market based but there is still a significant government intervention and interactions.  While private enterprises and market forces of demand and supply drive much of economic activity, the government plays an active role in regulating key sectors, providing essential public services and formulating policies aimed at promoting national economic development.[17]

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Mixed Economic System.

A mixed economy combines several of the desirable qualities of both a market (capitalist) economy and a planned (socialist) economy. By incorporating elements of private enterprise alongside government intervention, it seeks to balance efficiency with social welfare. This hybrid structure allows the private sector to drive innovation and competition while enabling the government to regulate economic activity in the public interest.

One major advantage of a mixed economy is increased efficiency and productivity due to market-based incentives. Since private businesses operate alongside public institutions, firms are motivated by profit incentives to innovate, reduce costs, and improve the quality of goods and services. This competitive environment promotes economic growth and allocative efficiency while still allowing for government oversight where necessary.[18]

Another significant advantage is the provision of welfare protections for the poorest members of the population. Unlike a purely market-based system, a mixed economy allows the government to implement social security programs, public healthcare, education, and other welfare policies. These interventions help reduce inequality, protect vulnerable groups, and promote a more equitable distribution of resources.

Despite these advantages, a mixed economy also has certain disadvantages. One key limitation is that funding welfare policies requires higher taxation. Increased taxes may reduce individuals’ disposable income and potentially discourage investment and entrepreneurship. Businesses may also face higher operational costs, which can affect economic growth.

Furthermore, government intervention may distort market forces, leading to inefficiencies and the misallocation of resources. Excessive regulation or poorly designed policies can reduce competition, slow innovation, and create bureaucratic obstacles that hinder economic performance.[19]

Additionally, mixed economies may be susceptible to regulations shaped by influential business interests. In some cases, regulatory policies may serve private interests rather than the broader public interest, leading to regulatory capture and reduced fairness within the economic system.[20]

7. THE INFLUENCE OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS ON PROCUREMENT LAW

Comparative Case Studies: USSR, China, and India

In the modern world, capitalism, also known as a free market economy and the mixed economy system, are the most widely adopted economic system. This development is largely the result of significant historical events. A notable example is the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), which operated under a strict communist and centrally planned economic system during the twentieth century. The Soviet Union’s experiment with a highly centralized planned economy contributed to its economic stagnation and eventual collapse in 1991.

The system was characterized by extensive state control over production and distribution, limited market incentives, and minimal private enterprise. Over time, this led to inefficiency, shortages, declining productivity, and widespread poverty. In addition to economic difficulties, political instability and rising nationalist movements within various republics further weakened the Union. Ultimately, the Soviet Union was formally dissolved on 25 December 1991.[21]

Another useful example is the People’s Republic of China, which also operated under a planned economic system for much of the twentieth century. However, following economic challenges and limited growth under strict central planning, China introduced significant economic reforms in 1978. Rather than maintaining a rigid planned economy, China adopted a hybrid or mixed economic system that combines state ownership with private enterprise, foreign investment, and market-based incentives. These reforms were partly motivated by the desire to avoid the type of economic collapse experienced by the USSR. As a result of these changes, China has experienced rapid economic growth and is currently one of the largest economies in the world.[22]

Procurement in China is governed by the Government Procurement Law of the People’s Republic of China 2002 The law reflects both market-oriented principles and elements of planned economy which has an element of State control, consistent with China’s mixed/ hybrid economic system.

For example, Article 3 of the Act provides that ‘‘government procurement activities shall adhere to the principles of openness, transparency, fair competition, impartiality, and good faith. These principles clearly reflect characteristics of a market economy, particularly the emphasis on competition and transparency.’’[23]

However, the Law also retains features of a planned system. Article 7 states that ‘‘government procurement shall be conducted through both centralized and decentralized methods, and that items subject to centralized procurement shall be determined according to a centralized procurement catalogue published by people’s governments at or above the provincial level. This provision demonstrates continued government oversight and control over certain procurement activities.’’[24]

Similarly, after independence, India adopted a mixed economy to balance public and private sector roles. Early Five-Year Plans and the Industrial Policy of 1948 guided this transformation, though progress was slow due to limited private capital. The 1991 liberalization revitalized the mixed economy: foreign brands entered the market, foreign direct investment (FDI) rose significantly, and consumers gained access to a wider variety of products, improving living standards. India’s experience highlights how economic systems impact business, investment, and consumer welfare.[25]

Public Procurement in Ghana within a Mixed Economy Framework

Lastly, unlike purely state controlled economies or planned economies, Ghana operates a mixed economic system, which distinguishes it from purely state-controlled or centrally planned economies. In this system, public institutions, private enterprises, multinational corporations, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and informal traders all actively contribute to economic activity, reflecting a blend of market-driven and government-directed mechanisms. A key feature of this framework is the regulation of public procurement,

The Act mandates that procurement processes by public entities be conducted through competitive methods, including international competitive tendering, national competitive tendering, requests for quotation, and restricted tendering. [26]This allows competition between both government and private entities.

This structured approach ensures transparency, accountability, and efficiency, while simultaneously promoting both public oversight and market competition. Consequently, Ghana’s procurement system reflects the interplay between market principles and state regulation, demonstrating the country’s broader economic strategy of balancing efficiency with social and developmental objectives. Beyond procedural mechanisms, the Public Procurement Act 2003 (Act 663) also addresses ethical conduct in procurement. Section 93(1) criminalizes corruption, stipulating that “entities and participants in a procurement process shall, in undertaking procurement activities, abide by the provisions of article 284 of the Constitution.” [27]This provision reinforces integrity and fairness, ensuring that procurement decisions are not influenced by personal gain or malfeasance.

From the perspective of a mixed economy, Section 93 exemplifies how regulatory oversight can protect public resources while supporting private enterprise and competition. By enforcing anti-corruption measures, the state safeguards market confidence, encourages foreign and domestic investment, and ensures that SMEs and other market participants operate on a level playing field. In essence, the Act integrates market efficiency with social and ethical governance, which is a hallmark of mixed economies: combining the innovation and competitiveness of markets with the corrective oversight of government intervention.

8. LESSONS FOR REFORM AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT

The historical experiences of the Soviet Union, China and India provide valuable lessons for modern mixed economies such as Ghana. These countries highlight both the strengths and weaknesses of different economic systems and demonstrate how a balance between state control and market forces can promote sustainable development.

One important lesson is the fragility of central planning as seen in the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics USSR. A system based on total state control over production and distribution limited innovation and resulted in persistent shortages of goods. The absence of market incentives reduced efficiency and weakened productivity over time. This illustrates that an economy without competitive pressures is unlikely to sustain growth or adaptability.

In contrast China’s economic reforms beginning in 1978 demonstrate the success of a mixed economic approach. By introducing market mechanisms such as private enterprise competition and foreign investment within a state guided framework China achieved rapid economic growth. The government maintained oversight while allowing market forces to improve efficiency. Its procurement approach shows that centralized coordination can exist alongside fair competition without undermining performance.

India’s economic liberalization in 1991 further reinforces the importance of market openness. Prior to these reforms heavy regulation restricted growth and limited consumer choice. The introduction of foreign direct investment and competition improved efficiency expanded the range of goods and services and raised living standards. This case shows that liberalization when carefully managed can significantly enhance economic welfare.

These lessons are directly relevant to Ghana’s procurement framework within its mixed economic system. The Public Procurement Act 2003 Act 663 provides a strong legal foundation aimed at balancing efficiency with accountability. The Act promotes competitive procurement methods such as International Competitive Tendering and National Competitive Tendering to ensure value for money while maintaining transparency. Section 93 (1) of the Act criminalizes corruption and is intended to protect market confidence and ensure fairness particularly for small and medium sized enterprises.

Despite this strong legal framework there is often a gap between theory and practice. One major issue is the frequent use of sole sourcing which undermines competition. Although intended for exceptional circumstances it is often applied more broadly thereby weakening market discipline. Efforts to address this challenge were highlighted in the State of the Nation Address on 27 February 2025 where the President announced plans to tighten procurement rules and restrict sole sourced contracts.[28]

Political interference also presents a significant challenge. While the law emphasizes impartiality procurement decisions are sometimes influenced by political considerations. This reduces trust in the system and discourages fair participation. Strengthening the independence of the Public Procurement Authority is necessary to ensure that procurement decisions are made based on merit rather than external pressure.

Another concern is bureaucratic delay. The combination of centralized and decentralized procurement processes can create inefficiencies and slow down project implementation. This can increase costs and discourage private sector involvement. The adoption of electronic procurement systems would improve efficiency by streamlining procedures increasing transparency and reducing opportunities for corruption. As stated above, Ghana has already initiated steps in this direction through ongoing digital financial management reforms including the transition to the Ghana Integrated Financial Management Information System GIFMIS which is expected to strengthen expenditure control and reduce manual inefficiencies.

Finally, enforcement of ethical standards remains weak. Although legal provisions against corruption exist prosecutions are limited which reduces their effectiveness as a deterrent. Establishing specialized procurement audit units within the Auditor General’s office would allow for continuous monitoring and ensure compliance in real time rather than after the fact.

Overall, the experiences of the Soviet Union China and India demonstrate that neither complete state control nor unrestricted markets are sufficient on their own. A balanced mixed economy is more effective when supported by strong institutions and consistent implementation of policies. For Ghana improving procurement practices through enhanced transparency reduced political interference and stronger enforcement will help bridge the gap between theory and reality and support long term economic development.

 

9.CONCLUSION

The design and the operation of public procurement law is fundamentally shaped by  the underlying economic system. Market economies emphasize efficiency and competition, planned economies prioritize control and equity while mixed economies seek to balance both.

Ghana’s mixed economic model provides a sound foundation for an effective procurement system. However achieving its full potential requires consistent implementation, strong institutions and a continued commitment to transparency and accountability.

Ultimately, effective procurement law must balance value for money, transparency and efficiency with broader socio-economic growth and promote the responsible management of public resources.

 

 

[1] Thai (ed), International Handbook of Public Procurement (Public Administration and Public Policy, CRC Press 2009) 35 Accessible from: https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781351562393_A30892272/preview-9781351562393_A30892272.pdf accessed 10 February 2026.

[2] Ghanaian Times, Public expenditure goes electronic effective Jan. 2026, Ghanaian Times (24 October 2025) Ghanaian Times Accessible from https://ghanaiantimes.com.gh/public-expenditure-goes-electronic-effective-jan-2026/ Accessed 4 March 2026

[3] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Public procurement spending’ in Government at a Glance 2013 (OECD Publishing 2013).

[4] Thai (ed), International Handbook of Public Procurement (Public Administration and Public Policy, CRC Press 2009) 35 Accessible from: https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781351562393_A30892272/preview-9781351562393_A30892272.pdf accessed 10 February 2026.

 

[5] Public Procurement Act 2003 (Act 663) s 1(1)

[6] Public Procurement Act 2003 (Act 663) ss 21–23.

[7] World Bank, ‘Global Public Procurement Database: Share, Compare, Improve!’ (23 March 2020) World Bank https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2020/03/23/global-public-procurement-database-share-compare-improve accessed 16^th February 2026.

[8] Ibid

[9] Corporate Finance Institute, Economic System (Corporate Finance Institute, 16 February 2026) https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/economic-system/ accessed 16 February 2026

[10] Ibid

[11] Market Economy vs Planned Economy (GripInvest, undated) https://www.gripinvest.in/blog/market-economy-vs-planned-economy accessed 16 February 2026.

[12] GSMA, MTN Mobile Money: Spotlight on Ghana (GSMA Mobile for Development, 2025) https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/mobile-for-development/country/ghana/mtn-mobile-money-spotlight-on-ghana/ accessed 16 February 2026.

[13] How did the Soviet economy work and why did it fail? (Russia Beyond, 2019) https://www.rbth.com/history/330630-how-soviet-economy-work accessed 16 February 2026

[14] Market Economy vs Planned Economy (GripInvest, undated) https://www.gripinvest.in/blog/market-economy-vs-planned-economy accessed 16 February 2026.

[15] Ibid

[16] Market Economy vs Planned Economy (GripInvest, undated) https://www.gripinvest.in/blog/market-economy-vs-planned-economy accessed 16 February 2026.

[17] Tejvan Pettinger, Mixed Economy – Economics Help (EconomicsHelp.org, 2023) https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/mixed-economy/ accessed 20 February 2026.

[18] Greg Young, Mixed economy (Encyclopædia Britannica, online) https://www.britannica.com/money/mixed-economy accessed 18 February 2026.

[19] Tejvan Pettinger, Mixed Economy – Economics Help (EconomicsHelp.org, 2023) https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/mixed-economy/ accessed 20 February 2026.

[20] Mixed Economy (EBSCO Research Starters, 2023) https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/political-science/mixed-economy accessed 16 February 2026

[21] Economy of the Soviet Union (Wikipedia, n.d.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_Soviet_Union accessed 16 February 2026

[22] China’s Role in the Global Economy (EBSCO Research Starters, 2024)  https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/economics/chinas-role-global-economy accessed 16 February 2026

[23] Government Procurement Law of the People’s Republic of China 2002, art 3.

[24] Government Procurement Law of the People’s Republic of China 2002, art 7.

[25] Market Economy vs Planned Economy (GripInvest, undated) https://www.gripinvest.in/blog/market-economy-vs-planned-economy accessed 20 February 2026.

[26] Public Procurement Act 2003 (Act 663) s 35.

[27] Public Procurement Act 2003 (Act 663) s93(1)

[28] The Fourth Estate. (2026, March). Disregard for President’s vow for prudence: Ministry awards 81 sole-sourced contracts worth over GHS73 billion in 7 months. The Fourth Estate. https://thefourthestategh.com/2026/03/disregard-for-presidents-vow-for-prudence-ministry-awards-81-sole-sourced-contracts-worth-over-ghs73-billion-in-7-months/

 

 

BY; ADRIANA ELLEN BLANKSON Esq.

 

Nartey Law Firm is a leading corporate and commercial law firm in Ghana providing legal services to individuals, domestic and international businesses. Ensuring the success of our clients’ objectives is at the core of what we do.  Comprised of a dedicated team of lawyers with extensive experience in corporate, commercial and international law and litigation, we pride ourselves with the diligent execution of all client matters, whilst guaranteeing an uncompromising standard with respect to excellence in service delivery. Some of our focus areas are Real Estate, Intellectual Property, Energy, Trade and Commerce, Banking and Finance, Regulatory Advisory, Capital Markets and Mergers and Acquisitions.

CONTACT:

NARTEY LAW FIRM

TEL: +233 (0)553508582

Email:info@narteylaw.com